LULU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of -6.21%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.64% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $358.57, signalling upside risk potential of 40.26%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $61.10 which suggests that it could grow by 33.13%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than General Motors.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.509%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $748.4M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.39x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.99x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 9.17%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.64% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $358.57, signalling upside risk potential of 40.26%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $323.87 which suggests that it could grow by 21.17%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Tesla.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $748.4M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.39x while Tesla's PE ratio is 131.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.99x versus 9.57x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of 7.35%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.64% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 17.74%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $358.57, signalling upside risk potential of 40.26%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $59.69 which suggests that it could grow by 31.95%. Given that Lululemon Athletica has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Lululemon Athletica is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.366, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.558%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $748.4M is higher than Urban Outfitters's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.39x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.99x versus 0.77x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Lululemon Athletica's net margin of -1119.66%. Lululemon Athletica's return on equity of 43.64% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -231.49%.

Lululemon Athletica has a consensus price target of $358.57, signalling upside risk potential of 40.26%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $234.56 which suggests that it could grow by 46592.77%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Lululemon Athletica, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Lululemon Athletica.

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.192% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lululemon Athletica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lululemon Athletica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lululemon Athletica quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $103.5K. Lululemon Athletica's net income of $748.4M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Lululemon Athletica's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.39x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lululemon Athletica is 2.99x versus 0.07x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.